Is killing for the sake of our nation is justified ?

N

National

New Member
Recently, Jamim Shah, the media baron from Nepal was killed by unidentified gunman. It is to be noted that he was responsible for creating anti India propaganda in Nepal some years ago. He misquoted a remark made by Bollywood film star Hrithik Roshan and mobilized and convinced the simple & innocent Nepali masses to start anti-India riots. He had always been trying to create anti India feelings amongst the Nepali citizens through his media house.

Some people are of the opinion that Killing of a single man to save thousands of other is not a crime. Be it any intelligence agency, or Chotta Rajan gang, whoever has done it should be appreciated. Otherwise Jamim Shah would have killed thousands other by creating false propaganda for the interest of anti national forces. Is it true?

The problem is that many other Jamim Shah still exist even within our country. Their work is to make false and exaggerated stories and create anti national feelings amongst the masses. Often they are funded by foreign powers. They exist in Assam, Kashmir, Gujrat , Uttar pradesh and all the other parts of our country. Some months ago, a similar type of person in Assam was killed by unknown person.

I invite the concerned citizens of our country to put forward their views. Is killing for the sake of our nation is justified?
 
Yes!
Killing for the sake of the nation is justified if that is deemed anti national.

Covert operations do not have to follow Rules of Engagement, as people who indulge in anti national activities also do not.

Covert operations are the only weapon to finish overt anti nationalism. Period.
 
Last edited:
these are some of the styles of modern warfare.creating chaos ,spreading false message,spreading anti national feeling etc
a good example if you look at the fight between US and soviets. US broke the country using this strategy.attacking civil population instead of military.an attack on the psychology of the people instead of killing them.we have to look for that type of enemy they are more dangerous than territory.they hide behind the walls of freedom of speech.
 
sharan said:
these are some of the styles of modern warfare.creating chaos ,spreading false message,spreading anti national feeling etc
a good example if you look at the fight between US and soviets. US broke the country using this strategy.attacking civil population instead of military.an attack on the psychology of the people instead of killing them.we have to look for that type of enemy they are more dangerous than territory.they hide behind the walls of freedom of speech.
Click to expand...

Well said!
The USA did not fire a single shot, and USSR disintegrated into present day Russia. And since then, economically Russia have been lingering even though they are one of the fastest growing economies (BRIC).

Modern warfare needs a futuristic thinking. This is what the GoI is lacking.

Afterall, India produced only one Indira Gandhi.
 
Killing for the sake of National Security is justified. No person is allowed to keep arms with them without a license and anyone who has illegal arms is punishable under the provisions of law and killing the one who possesses illegal arms can be deemed as an anti national and killing an anti national is no wrong as it is threat to our national security.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top