Hi all,
I have been learning from the posts under this forum. I have now summoned enough courage to post to the forum.
Poverty in India will remain as long as democracy in the present form continues. Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people. There are many political parties and coalitions of political parties. They compete with one another to mobilize maximum number of votes in favour of their candidates during elections. All political parties proclaim their main objective as the welfare of the poor. The poor people are also the least literate. They are the ones who can be carried away with false promises. Hence sustenance of poverty is the hidden agenda of all political parties. The poor defined as the BPL in our country are offered certain perks like subsidized distribution food grains. It looks, at first glance, a good scheme to keep hunger away from the poor people of our country. But on a closer look on the effect of the scheme, we cannot fail to notice the unsustainability of the scheme in the long run. Free supply of food articles to the farm labourers would lead them away from the farms and the marginal farmers would find it difficult to continue cultivation of food grains. As the food production drops, the marginal farmers are also driven to poverty. They will also seek susidized food articles. The farm lands would turn barren and get abandoned. The over all food grain production will, undoubtedly, decrease. However, as the poverty level in the country increases the demand for subsidized supply of food grains through the public distribution system will also increase leading to eventual failure of the system.
There is a need to protect the vulnerable from the vagories of market forces without killing their natural instinct to earn their keep honorably. The distribution of susidized food grains should be regulated to maintain their drive to contribute their mite for the welfare of the society.
Can we not formulate a plan to encourage both production and consumption of farm produce?
The farm labourers and farmers are both essential for food grain production. The benefits of research for increasing farm productivity shall be effectively transferred to the stake holders to sustain their interest to continue in their profession. The efficiency of such a sceme will depend to great extent on the literacy level of the beneficiaries. Hence this basic requirement also shall be addressed adequately to reap the desired success.
I would like feed back from the forum members on the topic.
Joy Jacob
I have been learning from the posts under this forum. I have now summoned enough courage to post to the forum.
Poverty in India will remain as long as democracy in the present form continues. Democracy is the government of the people, by the people and for the people. There are many political parties and coalitions of political parties. They compete with one another to mobilize maximum number of votes in favour of their candidates during elections. All political parties proclaim their main objective as the welfare of the poor. The poor people are also the least literate. They are the ones who can be carried away with false promises. Hence sustenance of poverty is the hidden agenda of all political parties. The poor defined as the BPL in our country are offered certain perks like subsidized distribution food grains. It looks, at first glance, a good scheme to keep hunger away from the poor people of our country. But on a closer look on the effect of the scheme, we cannot fail to notice the unsustainability of the scheme in the long run. Free supply of food articles to the farm labourers would lead them away from the farms and the marginal farmers would find it difficult to continue cultivation of food grains. As the food production drops, the marginal farmers are also driven to poverty. They will also seek susidized food articles. The farm lands would turn barren and get abandoned. The over all food grain production will, undoubtedly, decrease. However, as the poverty level in the country increases the demand for subsidized supply of food grains through the public distribution system will also increase leading to eventual failure of the system.
There is a need to protect the vulnerable from the vagories of market forces without killing their natural instinct to earn their keep honorably. The distribution of susidized food grains should be regulated to maintain their drive to contribute their mite for the welfare of the society.
Can we not formulate a plan to encourage both production and consumption of farm produce?
The farm labourers and farmers are both essential for food grain production. The benefits of research for increasing farm productivity shall be effectively transferred to the stake holders to sustain their interest to continue in their profession. The efficiency of such a sceme will depend to great extent on the literacy level of the beneficiaries. Hence this basic requirement also shall be addressed adequately to reap the desired success.
I would like feed back from the forum members on the topic.
Joy Jacob