Subsidy portrays Indian infidelity.It’s better to start with the basic definition of subsidy. In accordance with the definition, subsidy is nothing save a grant paid by a government to an enterprise that does good for the public. The same does take place in the Indian context too, without a shred of doubt. It is better to say the same has become a tradition by now and it has been happening from the year of national independence – 1947. And the reasons are quite obvious. It is an effort of the government to lend the poorer sections of India a hand through proffering subsidies so that they can deal with the mounting expenses.
But a question is rising after almost seven decades of independence. Is this act of Indian governance beneficial to the needy people at all? Or is this a mere publicity stunt and the money is lost in the midway? The question may stun lots of people and may portray infidelity of the same government scenario. Copious numbers of accounts representing the weaker sections of different regions of India do state that the situation is out of the frying pan into the fire. There was indeed a time when subsidies, however minuscule compared to the government’s original declaration, used to reach regions infested by the tribal people.
What is the current situation then? The money gets lots in the midway and the weaker people turn into weakest in a flash. If the question is raised ever (by God’s grace), the state government reprimands the central followed by the retort of the same and in the midst of this cacophony, the main issue gets lost.
Where is the problem then? The problem is in the Indian bureaucracy along with the governance, engaged in cajoling the propertied class for ever and a day. Several reports do state that the subsidies meant for the weaker people are actually endowed to the private sector and remaining 10% is sent in reality.
Isn’t this a betrayal? If not, the definition of this word must be changed without ado.Proud Indians please comment on this issue.
But a question is rising after almost seven decades of independence. Is this act of Indian governance beneficial to the needy people at all? Or is this a mere publicity stunt and the money is lost in the midway? The question may stun lots of people and may portray infidelity of the same government scenario. Copious numbers of accounts representing the weaker sections of different regions of India do state that the situation is out of the frying pan into the fire. There was indeed a time when subsidies, however minuscule compared to the government’s original declaration, used to reach regions infested by the tribal people.
What is the current situation then? The money gets lots in the midway and the weaker people turn into weakest in a flash. If the question is raised ever (by God’s grace), the state government reprimands the central followed by the retort of the same and in the midst of this cacophony, the main issue gets lost.
Where is the problem then? The problem is in the Indian bureaucracy along with the governance, engaged in cajoling the propertied class for ever and a day. Several reports do state that the subsidies meant for the weaker people are actually endowed to the private sector and remaining 10% is sent in reality.
Isn’t this a betrayal? If not, the definition of this word must be changed without ado.Proud Indians please comment on this issue.